Customhouse Brokers
International Freight Forwarders
           THE C-AIR TIMES

C-Air Customhouse Brokers
181 S. Franklin Avenue - Suite #502
Valley Stream, NY  11581
Ph.:  516-394-0400
Fx.:  516-394-0471 
www.c-air.com                                     
    ISSUE #124 - 7/16/10
 All prior Issues of The C-Air Times can  be found at the end this current Issue in the Newsletter Section of our website:
   www.c-air.com   
 
IN THIS ISSUE  :   
  

I am a big believer that eventually everything comes back to you. You get back what you give out.
                                         ~ Nancy Reagan
 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld July 8 a Department of Agriculture regulation allowing solid wood packaging material such as pallets and crates to be imported into the U.S. provided that it is either heat treated or fumigated. USDA issued this rule in September 2004 after reviewing a number of alternatives, all of which were designed to limit the spread of certain pests known to be carried in SWPM. In bringing this lawsuit the Natural Resources Defense Council and others argued that USDA failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act or the Plant Protection Act because it did not fully consider the reasonable alternative of a phased transition replacing SWPM with packing materials made of substitute materials such as processed wood, fiberboard, plywood or plastics.

The court disagreed, stating that USDA adequately evaluated the substitute materials alternative and reasonably explained its decision not to adopt it. The court pointed out that in its final environmental impact statement USDA recognized that a complete prohibition on SWPM would provide the greatest possible reduction in the risk of introducing pests and pathogens. However, USDA also determined that requiring the use of substitute materials might not be feasible due to a lack of current industry capability, increased expense and the need for a phase-in period. There was also concern that a prohibition on SWPM might violate the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, which stipulates that phytosanitary measures must be no more trade-restrictive than necessary to achieve the requisite level of plant protection. In contrast, APHIS selected the heat treatment and fumigation requirements because, among other things, they represented the existing international standard and would therefore simplify and standardize trade requirements.

According to the court, NEPA does not prohibit USDA from deciding that other values outweigh any adverse environmental effects of a proposed action. NEPA also did not require USDA to speculate on the potential changes to the global cost and availability of substitute materials in the event that it were to adopt a phased-in substitute materials-only requirement. Finally, the court found that USDA’s decision to impose the heat treatment and fumigation requirement did not violate the PPA by failing to elevate environmental concerns over other legitimate factors because the department has the dual responsibility to protect plants by reducing pest risk while also facilitating commerce by avoiding unduly burdensome trade restrictions.

 
 
 

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has launched its 2010 review of the Generalized System of Preferences and has set an Aug. 3 deadline for requests to modify the list of products eligible for duty-free treatment under this program. Such modifications may include expanding GSP coverage to goods not already eligible and withdrawing, suspending or limiting eligibility for goods currently receiving duty-free treatment.

USTR is also inviting petitions requesting that specified products remain eligible for GSP treatment through waivers of the competitive need limitation. These petitions may be filed after Aug. 3 and are due no later than Nov. 16.

USTR warns that petitions submitted after the respective deadlines will not be considered for review.

The deadline for receipt of petitions for the country practices eligibility review will be announced in the Federal Register at a later date.
 
 
 
 

The European Parliament has approved legislation to prohibit placing1 illegally harvested timber or timber products on the EU market, require certain due diligence and risk mitigation, and impose penalties for non-compliance.

According to a European Commission FAQ, this legislation, coupled with the U.S. Lacey Act which has a similar purpose, will send an important signal worldwide and encourage more timber producing countries to establish systems to verify legal compliance.

Expected to Take Effect in 2012, Pending Final Approval by European Council

According to the European Parliament, the European Council has already informally agreed with the terms of this draft legislation but will need to “rubber stamp” it before it can pass into law. The rules are expected to take effect in late 2012.

Would Affect Wood, Veneer, Paper, Frames, Furniture, Cases, Etc.

“Timber and timber products" would include certain wood, veneered panels, particleboard, fiberboard, packing cases, frames, paper, furniture, and other products in Europe’s Combined Nomenclature (CN) codes,2 specifically headings 4401, 4403, 4406-4416, 4418 and others in Chapters 47, 48, and 94, with the exception of products that had completed their lifecycle and would otherwise be disposed of as waste.

“First Placement on Market” Would Require Species, Compliance, & Other Info

Operators3 placing timber and timber products for the first time on the internal market would have to use a “due diligence” framework of procedures and measures, to ensure that illegally harvested timber and timber products are not placed on the market. This due diligence system would have to provide access to information about the:

  • trade name and type of product as well as the common name of tree species and, where applicable, its full scientific name;
  • country of harvest (and where applicable, the sub-national region where the timber was harvested and concession of harvest);
  • quantity (expressed in volume, weight or number of units);
  • name and address of the supplier to the operator;
  • name and address of the internal trader to whom the timber and timber products have been supplied;
  • documents or other information indicating compliance of those timber and timber products with the applicable legislation.

Risk Assessment and Mitigation Required

Operators would also have to carry out a risk assessment, and where a risk is identified, mitigate it in a manner proportionate to the risk identified, with a view to preventing illegally harvested timber and timber products derived from such timber from being placed on the market.

Could use existing systems. In order to avoid any undue administrative burden, operators already using systems or procedures which comply with the requirements of this regulation would not be required to set up new systems.

Could rely on certification. In order to recognize good practice in the forestry sector, certification or other third-party verified schemes that include verification of compliance with applicable legislation may be used in the risk assessment procedure.

Member States Could Seize Non-Compliant Products, Impose Penalties

Member states would be required to regularly evaluate operators’ due diligence systems and risk assessment and mitigation procedures, and if shortcomings are detected, could: (i) issue a notice of remedial actions to be taken by the operator; (ii) seize the timber and timber products concerned; (iii) immediately suspend the authorization to trade; and (iv) impose penalties.

(Note that under the legislation, internal traders in the supply chain would only be required to provide basic information on its supplier and its buyer to enable the traceability of timber and timber products.)

1"Placing on the market" would mean the supply by any means, irrespective of the selling technique used, of timber or timber products for the first time on the internal market for distribution or use in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge. It would also include the supply by means of distance communication.

2Timber and timber products as classified in the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87(1) to which this Regulation applies are:

  • 4401 Fuel wood, in logs, in billets, in twigs, in faggots or in similar forms; wood in chips or particles; sawdust and wood waste and scrap, whether or not agglomerated in logs, briquettes, pellets or similar forms;
  • 4403 Wood in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared;
  • 4406 Railway or tramway sleepers (cross-ties) of wood;
  • 4407 Wood sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed, of a thickness exceeding 6 mm;
  • 4408 Sheets for veneering (including those obtained by slicing laminated wood), for plywood or for other similar laminated wood and other wood, sawn lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded, spliced or end-jointed, of a thickness not exceeding 6 mm;
  • 4409 Wood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rebated, chamfered, V-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed;
  • 4410 Particle board, oriented strand board (OSB) and similar board of wood whether or not agglomerated with resins or other organic binding substances;
  • 4411 Fiberboard of wood or other ligneous materials, whether or not bonded with resins or other organic substances;
  • 4412 Plywood, veneered panels and similar laminated wood;
  • 4413 00 00 Densified wood, in blocks, plates, strips or profile shapes;
  • 4414 00 Wooden frames for paintings, photographs, mirrors or similar objects;
  • 4415 Packing cases, boxes, crates, drums and similar packings, of wood; cable-drums of wood; pallets, box pallets and other load boards, of wood; pallet collars of wood; coffins; (Not packing material used exclusively as packing material to support, protect or carry another product placed on the market.)
  • 4416 00 00 Casks, barrels, vats, tubs and other coopers' products and parts thereof, of wood, including staves;
  • 4418 Builders' joinery and carpentry of wood, including cellular wood panels, assembled flooring panels, shingles and shakes, wood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rebated, chamfered, V-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed;
  • Pulp and paper of Chapters 47 and 48 of the Combined Nomenclature, with the exception of bamboo-based and recovered (waste and scrap) products;
  • 9403 30, 9403 40, 9403 50 00, 9403 60 and 9403 90 30 Wooden furniture; and
  • 9406 00 20 Prefabricated buildings.

3"Operator" means any natural or legal person that places timber or timber products on the market.

(Parliament press release, dated 07/07/10, available here.)
 
 
 
 

Policy to create efficiency, reduce environmental impact  
 
States on a schedule starting on the East Coast in October and ending on the West Coast in March of next year.

The carrier said Thursday it expects the new chassis supply management policy will generate greater operational efficiency and reduce the environmental impact. OOCL recently announced a similar chassis supply management policy in three U.S. cities.

“By deleting idle time at terminals waiting for a chassis, by improving turn-around and transit time, this new system will allow not only to better meet the customers’ service expectations but also significantly reduce the carbon footprint of drayage operations, positively impacting the environment,” the French carrier said in its announcement.

It said the new policy, which is in line with what has been in force for years in the rest of the world, will give truckers flexibility and allow them to use chassis for multiple moves at different terminals, for different lines and services, which will remove inefficiencies and improve supply chain processes.

It also said the new policy will improve safety in terminals by removing surplus chassis, will reduce congestion and improve overall chassis conditions, “which will not have to suffer multiple connections/disconnections, generating damage to the equipment.”

CMA CGM plans to implement its new chassis management on the following schedule, which it said is tentative:
Oct. 1: Mobile;
Nov. 1: New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Boston;
Dec. 1: Jacksonville and Charleston;
Jan. 1: Houston and Dallas;
Feb. 1: Memphis, Nashville, Kansas City and St Louis;
March 1: Los Angeles/Long Beach, Oakland and Seattle.

CMA CGM said it will schedule other locations not mentioned at a later date.
 
 
 

Proposed standard to address drop side and mattress support hazards

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) voted (5 to 0) today to approve proposed new mandatory standards to address the hazards posed by full-size and non-full-size cribs.

Serious safety hazards with cribs have ranged from drop-side hardware or other drop-side entrapment issues to failures of the mattress support and detachment or breakage of the crib slats. All of these defects can create hazardous gaps allowing a baby to become entrapped and suffocate or fall out of the crib.

The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) directs CPSC to issue mandatory safety standards for durable infant or toddler products. CPSC’s notice of proposed rulemaking ("NPR") for cribs includes:

  1. a standard for full-size cribs that is substantially the same as ASTM F 1169-10, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Full-Size Baby Cribs, with one modification . The one modification that CPSC is proposing to the ASTM full-size crib standard would require cribs to be tested without the re-tightening of screws between tests in order to ensure that the tests reflect the lifetime use of the crib; and
  2. a standard for non-full-size cribs that is substantially the same as ASTM F 406-10, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs/Play Yards, with certain modifications. These modifications include adding certain requirements that apply to full-size cribs, such as the mattress support performance requirement, the side-impact test, and the order in which performance tests are to be done, applicable to non-full-size cribs so that the new standard for non-full-size cribs is more stringent. The proposal also would restore movable side latch tests to the non-full-size crib standard and would clarify that the proposal does not extend to play yards.

Through close collaboration with ASTM International, consumer groups, industry and other juvenile product experts, improved consensus standards were approved June 1, 2010, that incorporated key safety requirements recommended by CPSC staff. The ASTM standards and the proposed CPSC standards contain design requirements that essentially prohibit traditional drop sides (up and down movement of an entire side of the crib).

CPSC staff is working to finalize the proposed mandatory crib standards in 2010.

 
 
  

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has posted an updated and expanded version of its 10+2 frequently asked questions document on its 10+2 interim final rule that requires Security Filing information from importers and additional information from carriers for vessel (maritime) cargo before it is brought into the U.S.

This July 9, 2010 version contains a number of modifications. CBP last updated the FAQ on January 28, 2010.

Excerpts of the FAQ include the following (see future issue for a detailed summary):

Limited ACE portal for filing ISFs. CBP states it has begun development of an internet-based web portal to accept ISF filings. Use of the portal by the public will be very limited in scope. For qualified users, access will be limited to no more than two (2) ISF filings per day, with a maximum of twelve (12) per year. The ISF Portal will be available no earlier than August 2010.

ISF report and data warehouse. At this time CBP will not make available report cards through ACE; however, CBP has developed a reporting mechanism that is provided directly to registered ISF filers. CBP is also in the process of developing a data warehouse that will allow importers the ability to create and extract reports from CBP; this will include the capability to obtain transactional data. CBP will make every effort to deploy this capability to Tier 3 and Tier 2 C-TPAT importers sometime in the Fall of 2010.
 
 
 

Office clerical workers, terminal operators making ‘some progress’

Negotiations between office clerical workers and terminal operators in Los Angeles-Long Beach are scheduled to resume on Wednesday morning as both parties intend to spend Tuesday caucusing internally.

The Office Clerical Unit of International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 63 on Monday removed its pickets. The pickets remained down on Tuesday and cargo handling at the port complex proceeded normally.

OCU President John Fageaux said negotiations Monday produced "some progress" on minor issues, although the core issues were not addressed.

Stephen Berry, the attorney representing 14 shipping lines and terminal operators, said negotiators are closing out smaller contract points, such as when vacation days are to be used, but those issues will soon be exhausted and negotiators will have no choice but to address the core issues.

Both sides have drawn a line in the sand on the use of technology. Employers want to maintain the use of computer portals to allow cargo interests and third parties to file cargo bookings directly into the systems of shipping lines and terminal operators without clerical intervention.

Fageaux charged that employers are abusing the process, opening the portals so wide that they are in effect outsourcing work that has traditionally been performed by OCU members.

Berry responded that the contract provides a grievance framework under which alleged abuses are to be addressed. Also, employers continue to guarantee there will be no transfer of work and no lay-offs. "That's the answer to their concerns," he said.

A second core issue is the demand of employers for flexibility in assigning manpower. The contract mandates that when an office worker does not report to duty due to illness or vacation, the union will assign a replacement worker from the hiring hall.

Employers charge that replacement workers are not always needed, such as when work is slow, so they should not be required to hire replacements in those cases. Fageaux responded that the contract allows employers to seek relief in such instances, and the union has agreed on numerous occasions to allow positions to remain unfilled.

There has been little bargaining so far on wages and benefits. The two sides are far apart on this issue, but Fageaux said the union does not consider it to be a major issue in this year's negotiations.

The average OCU member last year earned $96,900, with benefits adding another $66,000 to that total, employers said.

 
 

Jamaica, N.Y. –A citizen of Ghana has been charged with attempting Saturday to smuggle more than 22 pounds of heroin into John F. Kennedy International Airport from Abidjan, Ivory Coast via Casablanca, Morocco. 

On July 10, Charles Kankam arrived from Casablanca, Morocco on Royal Air Morocco flight 200. He intended to visit an address in Piscataway, NJ.  

While conducting a random exam of the flight, one of CBP’s canines alerted to Kankam’s luggage. During an interview, Kankam was hesitant with his answers and provided inconsistent explanations. Upon examining his luggage, CBP officers noticed a strong odor, subsequently discovering a false bottom. The second bag also contained a false bottom.  

When searched, both bags revealed a powdery substance which tested positive for heroin. Kankam was placed under arrest. A total of more than 10 kilograms of heroin with a street value of over $700,000 was seized.  

“The men and women of the CBP remain professional and diligent while conducting critical enforcement exams, keeping our nation safe and free of illicit contraband,” said Robert E. Perez, CBP’s New York field office director. “This seizure is an example of their dedication and vigilance.”  

Kankam has been referred for possible federal prosecution.

  
 
Travel AdvisoryCBP Reminds Traveling Public to Leave, Fruits, Plants and Firewood at Home - USCBP 

Pembina, N.D. — U.S. Customs and Border Protection wants to remind the traveling public that they should leave fruits, plants and firewood at home when traveling to the United States.  

There are many types of fresh fruit, vegetables and live plants that may enter Canada from tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world. Oranges are one example. These fruits, however, are not allowed into the United States because they can harbor plant pests and diseases that could severely impact U. S. agriculture.  

A CBP agriculture specialist recently intercepted citrus fruit that was infested with arrowhead scales. The CBP agriculture specialist discovered the scale insects on fruit that he seized from travelers arriving in a private vehicle from Canada at the Grand Portage, Minnesota port of entry.

Scale insects are plant parasites that suck the sap from their host plant. They attach themselves to the host by secreting a stationary waxy cover or “scale” over their bodies. The protective scale allows them to feed unimpeded on their host, sucking its juices with their straw-like mouthparts. Arrowhead scale has the potential to cause severe damage to U.S. citrus crops. An infestation could cause tree dieback and reduced fruit yields. Eradication and quarantine efforts can be extremely costly and have a significant economic impact.  

Travelers should not attempt to bring fruits, meats, dairy, poultry products, or firewood into the United States from Canada without first checking whether they are permitted. They should also declare to CBP all agriculture products they may be carrying to avoid fines and delays. Travelers can check for restrictions on agricultural products on the “Know Before You Go” section of the CBP website or by contacting a Pembina CBP agriculture specialist at (701) 825-6551 extension 324. ( Know Before You Go)
 
 
 

WASHINGTON, July 8, 2010 – The firewood used during camping, bonfires and cooking out is considered as important an ingredient for summertime fun as sunscreen and bug spray.  But, before heading to the great outdoors, the U.S. Department of Agriculture would like to remind people of the dangers of moving firewood.  Firewood presents a very real threat to the nation’s forests and community trees because of the tree-killing hitchhikers that may travel along.  When enjoying the outdoors, please buy your firewood where you burn it.  Don’t bring it with you.

Invasive insect pests like the emerald ash borer (EAB), Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) and gypsy moth can be spread to new areas by people transporting their firewood.  These insects are attacking and killing trees in the United States.  Loss of tree resources because of these invasive pests can damage healthy ecosystems, impact quality of life and affect industries such as lumber and timber production.

The emerald ash borer is an invasive wood boring beetle that targets ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) and all the ash species – including green, white, black and blue – are at risk.  EAB kills stressed and healthy trees and is so aggressive that ash trees may die within two or three years after they become infested.  EAB larvae tunnel under the bark to feed in the phloem and outer sapwood, causing damage that eventually girdles and kills the tree.  It was first detected in 2002 in southeastern Michigan.
 
Today, in addition to Michigan, there are known EAB infestations in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
 
The ALB is an invasive insect that feeds on healthy maple trees, as well as ash, birch, elm, European mountain ash, hackberry, horsechestnut, katsura, London plane tree, mimosa, poplar and willow.  The adult beetle lays its eggs just under tree bark.  By the late summer and fall, the caterpillar-like larva tunnels deep into the tree.  The following summer, the ALB chews its way out of the tree as an adult beetle.  ALBs tunnel and bore through tissues that carry water and nutrients throughout the tree, eventually starving and killing the tree.  The ALB can grow and develop in cut firewood.  Since it was first discovered in Brooklyn, N.Y., in 1996, the beetle has caused the destruction of over 69,000 hardwood trees in the United States alone.

The leaf-eating gypsy moth caterpillars devour the leaves of many hardwood trees and shrubs. Gypsy moth larvae can kill trees and damage local ecosystems.  Studies show that most new, isolated infestations of the gypsy moth were started from egg masses transported on outdoor household articles or firewood accessible to the female moth at egg-laying time.

There are some simple things that can be done to avoid moving such pests while enjoying an outdoor fire.


  
                      New York                                              Los Angeles                                                  Miami   
          181 South Franklin Avenue                  9841 Airport Boulevard - Suite 1400              3425 N.W. 112th Street
          Valley Stream, NY  11581                   Los Angeles, CA 90045                                 Miami, Florida 33167 
          Ph:  (516)  394-0400                           Ph:  (310)  348-3777                                      Ph:   (305) 405-7311
          Fax: (516) 394-0499                           Fax: (310) 216-9525                                       Fax: (305) 363-1425    

 





Newsletter Archive:



C-Air Times Newsletter #130 - 9/03/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #129 - 8/27/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #128 - 8/20/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #127 - 8/13/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #126 - 8/06/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #125 - 7/30/10

C-Air Times Newsletter #124 - 7/16/10

C-Air Newsletter Issue 50 01/30/09

C-Air Newsletter Issue 49 01/23/09

C-Air Newsletter Issue 48 01/16/09

C-Air Newsletter Issue 47 01/05/09

C-Air Newsletter Issue 46 12/29/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 45 12/19/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 44 12/12/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 43 12/05/08

C-Air Special Edition 11/26/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 42 11/21/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 41 11/14/08

C-Air Special Edition 10+2 Announcement 11/10/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 40 11/07/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 39 10/31/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 38 10/24/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 37 10/17/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 36 10/10/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 35 10/03/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 34 09/26/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 33 09/19/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 32 09/12/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 31 09/05/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 30 08/29/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 29 08/25/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 28 08/15/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 27 08/08/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 26 08/01/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 25 07/25/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 24 07/18/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 23 07/11/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 22 07/02/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 21 06/27/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 20 06/20/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 19 06/13/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 18 06/06/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 17 05/30/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 16 05/23/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 15 05/16/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 14 05/7/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 13 04/30/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 12 04/16/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 11 03/31/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 10 03/19/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 9 03/8/08

C-Air Newsletter Issue 8 02/22/08